I think that we often look at visible and tangible consequences when we search, act, play and interact. We look at footprints more than at an eye, which chose the way at a particular moment in time. Then, we search for a reason as we live in a culture and in a society that operates by causality as its main principle.

Still, there is an invisible part of each act, – a dimension of a point of view. An intention, a way, we interpret ourselves as well as a world around us. In a way as an observer influences an object and an object influences an observer. This is a reason I use the reference to a hermeneutic circle in my work.

A world influences one’s point of view on how one interacts, reacts, interpret reality. A world and its laws form one’s psychological and physiological patterns, his personal background, and his professional area by world’s nature and culture at a moment of time that one lives. And one’s personality, although formed by laws, rules and life around him, keeps its own form of expression. I do not mean but this a number of character traits but a vivid organic nature that interacts with a world in its own manner. By its own signature and its own perception and definition of its struggles, wishes, expectations, limits. And this personal, unique interaction then influences a world in its turn: its laws, its rules and its life.

I call it a unity of pattern and intention, where a one’s pattern behavior influenced by a world but an intention is a very personal state of one’s personality. We may read the same text in a different ways and focus on different things because of our intention and condition at every each moment of reading. Still, the text is the same. For this reason, I think that it may operate by synchronicity or other forms of acausal links rather than by causality.

I guess that a concept of keywords does not completely work because when we search for the text, we may have multiple intentions depending on our actual state. It is not a text or information we search but a way to interpret our intention of a particular moment.This is why I see an interaction between personalities or a personality and a world, as an intersection of intentions like astronomical orbits. The gravity force here is a personality’s focus and attention in a particular moment of time. I call it an attraction of one’s analogy bubble (state of mind and intention) by another analogy bubble by their synchronicity and associations.

In Hermenaria project, I call a one’s point of view at a particular moment of time an analogy bubble. And world’s laws, rules and life is presented in informational artefacts. Their interactions come from an interpretation of an artefact by one’s point of view in a particular state of mind. The same artefact may be read and interpreted in infinite ways, as there are infinite states of mind of every personality.  

I think that we enter in a new digital age and I design an analogy bubble as a synthesis of artistic forms. I explore a literature form of epistolary novel as a collection of perceptions as well as nonlinear narrative and unreliable narrator. I use forms of diary, notes, messages, dialogs, reports and inner voice. I also question myself about a role of a third person narration, as it could be an analogy bubble form. I explore a cinematic visual language to describe one’s analogy bubble by color, light, focus, editing, zoom and other elements that may create an interpretation of one’s intention through an ambience and a mood. I use concepts coming from multimedia artistic forms as visual novel and TRPG and RPG gameplay as a way of showing one’s point of view.